The Roy Morgan numbers published on the weekend show One Nation projecting between 53 and 64 seats at a federal election held today.
There is a particular kind of press conference at which an Australian prime minister announces a victory that was, until very recently, a defeat.
By Sunday night the press releases were calling the carve out a sensible refinement. By Monday morning the small business sector was calling it what it actually is, which is a full strategic surrender carried out under fire from the business pages.
There are three numbers Australians should walk away from the last twenty four hours of Senate estimates remembering.
I consent to receive newsletter via email. For further information, please review our Privacy Policy
There is something orderly, almost gentle, about how the British system disposes of its prime ministers. The papers had been writing about it for a fortnight. The Burnham camp had been meeting publicly on Friday.
There is a certain kind of policy debate where everyone is so busy being right about the principle that nobody bothers to check what is actually working. Energy is the one that gets it the worst.
There is, I am told by Senator James Paterson on the wireless this Thursday morning past, a "very grave risk of a capability gap emerging over the next two decades" in Australia's submarine fleet. A capability gap, you understand, is not the same as having no submarines.
Charlie used to say that the most expensive four words in investing are "this time it's different." Charlie was usually right. He was, I believe, wrong about one thing, and the report from RethinkX called Understanding Stellar Energy is the clearest statement I have read of why.
A new Cato research brief, drawing on work by Richard V. Burkhauser and Kevin Corinth published as NBER Working Paper No. 34759, has done what every honest measurement does: it has destroyed a myth.
The lead leader of The Economist on 4 June carried a headline that, twenty years ago, would have been thought editorially impossible: "How to fight back against Gen-Z socialism."
Spare a sympathetic thought for California, the only American state proud enough of its public administration to insist that counting paper takes a fortnight.
The Albanese government has set aside two parliamentary sitting days for the inquiry into its proposed capital gains tax and negative gearing changes.